[ddo] Tonight?

[Leigh Murphy]

Wow, seems like I missed a real doozy of a session. Conor, sorry to hear
you're leaving but I can understand your frustrations and ours. I haven't
been as available as before guys, sorry, Exams, sick family, sick me, but I
am looking forward to the new year.
I think we've all lost sight of the main idea behind this arrangement.
Initially we planned to play as if it was a PNP night, with the same
dedication and ground rules.
It did go a tad pear shaped when the people who could play more, did and a
lot at that. I still treat it as a PNP thing, I love the sessions where we
do it slow (oh baby), and I couldn't give a rats ass about the XP or Rep,
besides them being a necessary evil to advance.
I don't want to log in and feel like it's a job, which is why I quit WoW, I
don't like to grind.
It seems we all want different things so, cool, lets stay in touch.
Unless Sus, our friend who has promised to visit this week sometime
depending on her schedule visits this evening, I can play tonight.
A cool trap dungeon eh? :-)) Well, I did build a trap monkey in the blissful
ignorance that that would be important for the group.

Leigh.



On 1/3/07, Mike Kelly <mike.j.kelly at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 02/01/07, Cliffy <cliffy at iol.ie> wrote:
> >
> > Explanation is fair enough.
> >
> > I was absolutely ragin' to my core last night, and as far as I was/am
> > concerned there is no point in me playing this game with ye till ye get
> > to
> > lvl 11 or 12. Because no matter what I've done or tried to do in the
> > last
> > few months I have constantly been in the wrong - and thats really great
> > fun
> > to put up with night after night after night.
> >
> > I have had to defend myself repeatedly from all kind of accusations over
> > the
> > last few months and the large number of accusations in a row last night
> > was
> > just too much. Way too much.
>
>
> Wow, good to know that I wasn't the only one pissed off after last night.
> Oh, and for the record, we moaned and complained about you racing off
> (actually I think that I gritted my teeth more than anything else, both
> myself and Diarm were pretty much silent), we didn't really accuse you of
> anything. But hey, while you have the tar and feathers out why not give
> everyone a good coating?
>
>
> Last night for example (fact from my perspective):
> > - When I logged on ye were trying to get XP, getting further ahead of
> > Leigh,
> > Brian and I.
>
> - When I asked ye about it ye weren't trying to get xp, you were trying to
> >
> > get rep.
>
>
> I personally was trying to get Kundarak rep but and complete some of the
> level 4-6 quests we've missed on the way up. I was aware of and grateful for
> the fact that you also get XP when you rep grind, 1 or 2k here and there
> with the quests we were doing (with the bonuses for completing things the
> first time on hard and elite and our -20% to -40% for level difference).
> It's not like we were seeking out the high XP quests. I do want to advance
> my character, I'll be only too happy to play alts and help Leigh catch up
> (my 4th level cleric seems likely) but I do want to advance my main too. You
> said something like "Sashkia needs that quest, I'll bring her if you don't
> mind the XP?", I'm paraphrasing there. We said sure, I didn't particularly
> mind, I'd have preferred Aglaranna but hey, a level 12 cleric can always
> come in handy and I know that I'd much prefer to be rep grinding with my
> main rather than an alt so all in all it's no big deal.
>
> As for this being the ultimate evil or something I'd like to point out
> that in the past we have all both grinded rep and done new content when
> people were off, I remember doing so on a number of occasions when other
> people couldn't play and the few times that I couldn't make it everyone else
> has played on without me, that's why we keep coming across quests that
> other's have done but I haven't, or Diarm hasn't or Joe or Leigh or Brian
> and no doubt there are quests that we have done but you haven't and quests
> that you have done but we haven't. When you play through a dungeon you
> usually get XP, regardless of whether it's the first time through to enjoy
> new content or your second or third time for rep.
>
> You seem to be implying that we were somehow sneakily gaining XP while
> Brian and Leighs backs were turned, we weren't and I resent the implication.
>
>
>
>
> > - So I came on with Sashkia to make getting rep for ye easier/quicker
> > (and
> > also because I also need house K rep with Sashkia). We did an instance
> > I've
> > never done with any character.
>
>
> And that is the problem in a nutshell Conor: we don't want to do it
> easier/quicker we want to enjoy the dungeons, at a slower pace, using
> something approaching tactics, particularly new content! At least I do and I
> suspect others do to. That dungeon "Taming the Flames" looked absolutely
> awesome but the whole thing was a blur to me because most of the time I was
> running to try keep up with you as you raced off banishing elementals left
> and right. On several occasions I checked the large map (to see where you'd
> gone to, you must have looted Mercurys boots or something because you're
> like a bloody greased cheetah somehow) and you were miles away, it wasn't
> fun, far from it. Particularly in a multi layer dungeon like that. That, I
> believe, is where Joes comment about it being no fun trailing after Sashkia
> came from. Or by saying that I don't enjoy your style of play am I accusing
> and victimising you again? This is very much a two way street, you feel
> we're attacking you (and to be fair we are critical of you as we have been
> of Diarm and Brian) but you seem to see yourself as completely blameless in
> all this. You aren't. Have you considered that maybe, just maybe we have a
> teensy point? That maybe you do tend to hare off trailing the rest of us
> behind you? Or is it more likely that we're all just against you?
>
>
> - Then I was going to be the reason one of ye called it a night cos ye
> > weren't getting anything "out" of the night. Rather than "ask" me to
> > switch
> > to Aglaranna or Tryxia I got the "well with you playing Sashkia I might
> > as
> > well log for the night" treatment. Mike to be fair asked "are you going
> > to
> > bring on Aglaranna?", when I asked why I got the "I'm logging off if you
> >
> > don't" comment.
>
>
> Yep, I did, but just to make it clear the order of events was I asked if
> you were going to bring on Aglaranna and *then* the comment was made (and
> not by me). I asked mainly because I didn't think I could face another
> dungeon chasing after Sashkia while she blitzed low level (to her)
> creatures. Think about it, how much fun is it to be run through Deadmines by
> a level 60? The XP thing was a (I thought) transparent ruse, a reason to get
> rid of Sashkia because I wanted to actually do something and leave a quest
> with a sense of achievement, not one of bewilderment wondering where we went
> and why. In short I want to enjoy the experience, I was frustrated as hell
> at that time and was fighting to keep it out of my voice. Again Conor while
> we may be snappish with you, you could stand to consider us and how your
> actions affect our enjoyment as much as you want us to consider your
> enjoyment.
>
>
> - So then ye decided that ye were actually trying to get XP, so I logged
> > on
> > with Aglaranna. We did another instance I've never done with any
> > character.
> > - then I was ruining new content on Diarm by charaging off (despite
> > doing
> > the quest for the first time myself).
>
>
> Again, we were running for Rep, but as I've said, XP is good too.
>
> You were ruining new content by charging off on me too, it kinda kills the
> atmosphere when you're just legging it off the entire time just running into
> the middle of groups of mobs that we could be taking a lot more cleverly and
> cleanly, something you've berated us for at length in the past. Also, as you
> well know, and have told us on numerous occasions, it's a royal pain in the
> ass to be trying to heal someone when they're running away from you, it
> wastes spell points and wand charges. Or is it OK for you to do it but not
> OK for us?
>
>
> - then I was playing an uber level 7 character with uber stuff and somehow
> > that was ruining things too.
>
>
> Not for me.
>
>
> For the record Ag was funded by Sashkia at 2nd and 4th levels and has been
> >
> > self sufficient ever since. I'd be reasonably sure that Odile probably
> > has
> > better stuff that Aglaranna - Diarm can you beat a +3 weapon and +3
> > plate,
> > and a +4 shield?
> >
> > I fully expect I ruined the other quest that you did after I left too,
> > somehow.....
>
>
> Nope, for the next quest, we stuck together and picked them off,
> slaughtering them easily, it worked very well and was a load of fun,  loads
> of traps too, they weren't so much fun but were really devious, some of the
> best I've seen in the game. Recommended for rogues *nudge Leigh* although I
> think Leigh, Diarm, Brian, yourself and I have already did Redwillow Ruins,
> Joe hadn't done it.
>
> When Diarm or Brian rush off into battle its fine "cos he's playing a
> > Chaotic dwarf" or a Paladin smiting evil. when my fighter does the same
> > I'm
> > ruining content and playing an unbalanced overpowered character.
> > And whats even more annoying is the fact that nobody can understand (or
> > even
> > bother trying to before throwing me a bollicking) why I would want to
> > play
> > an overly agressive fighter after playing 19 levels of healbot .....
>
>
> On a point of pedantry (my favourite type :) ), Diarm is playing a NG
> fighter, and if you remember correctly you'll remember that he gets fucked
> out of it when he runs off too, that's why he rarely does anymore. If the
> lead character isn't Annabelle he sticks close to them, hes a fighter it's
> what he does. These days he keeps back when Leighs scouting, now me and Joe
> are invariably the last two in the "marching order" and let me tell you that
> you're nearly always further ahead than Diarm even if only by a few steps.
> Brian can also be a bit gung ho, but I remember a few choice words being
> directed to him at times.
>
> I have no problem with you wanting to play a fighter that's why I didn't
> say anything about it, we do understand and myself and Diarm were wondering
> how you still do it. But you chose your own actions Conor including getting
> Sashkia 3 levels ahead of the least experienced of us and rolling a second
> Cleric, they were all your ideas.
>
>
> I simply cannot take the double standards any more, anything that I've
> > done
> > in the last few months, where any of ye have had two ways of looking at
> > a
> > situation you've opted for the negative angle; every bloody time, both
> > in
> > game and on email. My favourite comment was the one of few weeks ago "I
> > know
> > you didn't say or do anything - but I could get a feeling for where you
> > wanted us to go".
>
>
> Funny but your first sentence will do well enough for my purposes too.
> Funny how you've done exactly what you accuse us of, you harangue us for not
> playing smart then you streak off into group of mobs after group of mobs
> allowing yourself to be surrounded and to hell with the rest of us. You give
> out to us for running off half dead after a fight but it's ok for you to do
> it. You give out to us but we can't say anything back to you. Talk about
> double standards.
>
> I've noticed you're never at fault Conor. That must be nice. A couple of
> "wait up Conors" and "stop racing offs" and all of sudden we're all on your
> case! Who exactly is always opting for the negative angle here?
>
> You seriously need a higher natural armour bonus. :)
>
>
> When I was out of order and levelled Sashkia I tried to make up for it by
> > soloing my way to sixth level with another cleric, but now its ok for
> > you
> > guys to get further ahead than everyone else and force me into more
> > soloing
> > to get back on a par again - and you know what; I fully expected to take
> > an
> > earful if I did do that.
>
>
> So us doing some quests 2-4 levels below us for rep and (incidental, but
> much appreciated) XP on a night where we arranged to play but not all of us
> made it is the same as you pugging and gaining 3 levels over the lowest
> party member? There's one level between us and Leigh now, there's a world of
> difference between the two and if you tried then you could see that too.
>
>
> Now I can understand the spoiling of fun that I seem to have caused, and
> > the
> > frustration that it caused.
> > But to take the same shite in a dungeon I've never done, with a
> > character a
> > level below you, with my mic muted - that was just barmy. Everyone's
> > just
> > too ready to have a go at me, and that was the straw that broke the
> > camels
> > back.
>
>
> I'm sure I've made this clear earlier but just in case, it's not that you
> were spoiling it by telling us what was coming up or where to stand or
> whatever, you were spoiling it by fucking off on your own, you were ruining
> it (for me) with your continued Leeroy-esque tactics. Doing exactly the same
> things that you bailed us all out for a few months ago. Again, is it alright
> for you to do but not for us?
>
>
> I'm hoping after about 3-4 levels of playing without me, you might be less
> >
> > inclined to jump down my throat for just being at the other end of a
> > modem
> > trying to play a computer game. I still think its great fun playing with
> > you
> > guys, but I'm not taking this rubbish. Its a game - when you guys stop
> > having fun for a second you make me feel about two feet tall, and you
> > threaten to log off, go to bed, quit the game (I've heard it all). You
> > guys
> > have all made this stop being fun for me, but I don't see the point in
> > making you all feel like crap more than once.
>
>
> Conor, I do enjoy playing the game with you too but not so much lately.
> Hopefully, some day you might decide to look at what and how you're playing
> and try to see how you might be stripping the enjoyment for us. I for one
> doubt that I have ever made you feel "two feet tall" and I bet that you'd be
> hard put to find an example for me, however maybe we all need to be a bit
> more considerate and thoughtful. BTW the key there is "we all need".
>
> I hated the way we went through the Taming the Flames quest, and I mean I
> truly, fucking *hated* it but before now I would have held back in case I
> offended you. Frankly, I won't put take this crap anymore either. I think
> there's a way we can all enjoy this game together, but you'll have to be
> willing to admit and accept that although we can be critical we're not out
> to get you and look into the possibility that maybe there are things you
> should change too.
>
>
> Now I know it's hard to tell from that, Conor, but I genuinely have
> nothing but love for you (man). It's just that it's no fun when you play the
> way you did last night.
>
> You can choose to be offended or angry by what I've written here but be
> aware that you're making a choice in doing so and before you do remember
> that what I've said is no worse that anything you've levelled at me in your
> email and mine wasn't intended in a "oh yeah? Well screw you too!" way. It
> wasn't easy for me to say and isn't intended to make you feel angrier or
> worse, sometimes I just have to get things off my chest too. Especially
> these nipple clamps. ;)
>
> Anyway, I've spent far too much time on this and I have to go to bed. NN
> all.
>
> Mike.
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> ddo mailing list
> ddo at dspsrv.com
> http://www.dspsrv.com/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/ddo
>
>
>


-- 
Leigh Murphy,
Højmarken 13, Gevninge,
4000 Roskilde,
Danmark.
(H) + 45 46 36 02 20 (M) + 45 50 59 80 25

photos www.dspsrv.com/leigh
Skype: LeighSter

Master of the DeathSport - Squash.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://www.dspsrv.com/pipermail/ddo/attachments/20070103/36711d71/attachment-0001.htm